EUROPE

Responding to Ireland's "No": Let’s go back to one commissioner per country

Autumn 2008

Ireland’s “no” to Lisbon is hardly surprising when you consider what the people of Europe really want from constitutional reform. The Laeken declaration that launched the reform process back in 2001 spelt out those demands. It said “citizens are calling for a clear, open, effective, democratically-controlled Community approach, and therefore the Union needs to become more democratic, more transparent and more efficient.” The Lisbon treaty is in practice the exact opposite. We were handed down complex and unreadable texts, negotiated in secret and without public scrutiny. A post-referendum Eurobarometer survey found that more than half of the Irish people who decided not to vote said this was due to their lack of understanding of the treaty. In the circumstances, abstention was a rational choice.

 MATTERS OF OPINION


Ireland’s missing voters – who abstained and why

Two-thirds (67%) of those questioned in a Eurobarometer survey of 2,000 people conducted immediately after Ireland’s recent referendum on the Lisbon treaty said the “no” campaign on the treaty had been more convincing, and this view was even held by a majority of the “yes” voters (57%). More than half those polled said that they only decided whether to vote “yes” or “no” in the final weeks of the campaign and 15% decided on the day itself.

Over half those who did not vote in the referendum said this was because they didn’t understand the issues, and more than half of these (54%) said they would have liked more information from the Irish government.

Ireland’s young voters were especially reluctant to participate in the referendum; more than twice as many in the 18-24 year-old age group abstained than among the over-55s (64% compared to 31%). Fewer than half of those interviewed who were students or unemployed had voted (40 and 49%, respectively), compared to a higher-than-average turnout among the self-employed (61%) and retired people (67%).

There was a marked difference in voting between age groups: nearly two-thirds (65%) of young people aged 18-24 voted “no” in the referendum, compared with fewer than half (42%) of the over-55s.






http://www.gallupworldpoll.com/ 

Another key factor in the Irish vote was people’s fear of losing their country’s EU commissioner. According to the Lisbon treaty, after November 2014 the number of commissioners should correspond to two thirds of the number of member states. On today’s EU membership figures, that would make 18 commissioners from 27 countries. The European Council could alter this provided EU leaders are unanimous. But so far these leaders have been trying to persuade everyone that the new rotation system will allow every member state to have their own commissioner for 10 years out of every 15 years. I myself cannot believe this will work. The Lisbon treaty clearly states that the commissioners will be chosen on a rotation basis that reflects the demographic and geographic weight of the member states. In other words, smaller countries will have to wait longer for their turn than the bigger ones. 

We all know, of course, that the Commission is supposed to be completely independent, and that EU commissioners should neither seek nor take instructions from any government, institution or other body. We also know, however, that in practice they are widely considered to be advocates for their home nations, protecting national political interests and business. Thankfully, there was a growing acceptance at the mid-year European Council summit just after the Irish vote that keeping one commissioner per country would be a key component of any new deal.

Some argue that a Commission with 27 members (or more) is too big and too slow. But let’s compare it, say, with the government of France which has 38 ministers for a country of 64m people. How large and bureaucratic is that, Monsieur Sarkozy? The European Union has a population of around 500m, so there’s a big difference! Despite this, the current rules laid down by the Nice treaty require a cut in the size of the Commission next time around. No exact number is specified; it will be up to the European Council to decide unanimously on a figure below 27 - unless a new treaty comes into force before June 2009.

The EU has overcome repeated crises in its 50-years history, and I believe that a way will be found out of this one too. But the solution must avoid aggravating the people’s distrust of Europe and its institutions. Only half of our citizens trust the EU at the moment, according to the June’s Eurobarometer survey and this is real cause for concern. If the people of Ireland - and other smaller member states too – want their own commissioner, then that is something we must keep in mind. The EU can gain legitimacy in many ways and a commissioner from every country is one way to increase the sense of public scrutiny. It should definitely be part of the solution to the EU’s latest crisis.



You need to be logged in to rate and comment on articles.
Click the log in or register button in the top right corner of this page.
Average rating:
 
You are not logged in.
Please log in or register to submit
comments or rate articles.
 
 
Kent_University_BXLs
Gallup2009_BalkanMonitor

The twelfth edition of Europe's World is out. We feel it's fair to say that few if any publications in the field of international relations and policy debate have grown as fast or widened their scope so remarkably as Europe's World.

Europe's World is also adding a new section entitled the Arab World to complement existing sections that as well as covering international and European issues include Security & defence, the Developing World and Sustainable Europe.

 

Has the crisis shown that “a European economy” is just a pipe dream?

Job losses in the EU, warns BUSINESSEUROPE, are expected to reach 4.5m this year, with Spain and the UK each accounting for almost 1m unemployed people. By 2010 Europe’s unemployment rate could reach 10%. It will not strike every EU country equally, but it is clear that the majority of them will be faced with unemployment rates of over 10% by the end of this year. Forecasted unemployment in countries like Spain could rise to 16-19% by December. Has the crisis shown that “a European economy” is just a pipe dream? 

 


What do YOU think?
 Leave your comments at the end of the article