LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Spring 2010

by Josep Antoni Duran i Lleida

Europe cannot afford to simply observe U.S. action from the sidelines. This approach could land Europe in the midst of a conflict without being able to rely on a U.S. lead resolution.

Sir,

Nick Witney is right to warn that if Europe is not careful it may find itself caught up in an awkward crisis in the Middle East. This scenario can only be avoided if Europe makes use of the tools provided by the Lisbon treaty.

As Witney points out, Europe is vulnerable both to Russia and to the Middle East. For the most part Witney is right about Russia. Despite being a great power, Russia’s might pales in comparison to that of the former Soviet Union. Europe can aspire to a reasonable relationship with Russia, in a conception of external relations summed up by Lord Palmerston’s motto: “England has no eternal allies or enemies, but perpetual interests.”

According to Witney, the Middle East poses Europe’s second greatest challenge. Europe’s relationship with the Middle East runs deep. It extends far back in history with wounds that have yet to heal.

European involvement in the Middle East is largely dependent on U.S. involvement. In his first year in office, Barack Obama has started to engage with the Middle East conflict. Like many of the President’s actions, his actions in the Middle East, have not yet translated into tangible achievements. This is because the situation in the Middle East is complex, and because the hopes vested in Obama are leading to frustration. However, the U.S.’s path towards energy independence may lessen their need for involvement in the Middle East.

This possibility means that Europe may have to rethink its approach. It cannot afford to simply observe U.S. action from the sidelines. This approach could land Europe in the midst of a conflict without being able to rely on a U.S. lead resolution.

In my view, Witney’s diagnosis is correct. But it should not be a reason for despair. From January 1st, Europe can avoid being sidelined, particularly when it comes to events in the Middle East. Much will depend on the reaction of member states. Their diverging votes on the Goldstone report do not bode well for the future. But, from January 1st, new tools will be available and there are many examples in European’s history which show that when the right tools are available, they are used wisely.

As Europeans, the Middle East is one of our most important challenges. But it also gives reason for hope.