SUSTAINABLE EUROPE

The climate challenge now offers the EU a global role

Spring 2010
With so much of the climate change agenda linked to development aid priorities, Steen Gade, chair of the Danish Folketing’s environment committee, sets out his vision of an EU action plan
Last December’s COP 15 climate change summit in Copenhagen fell far short of being the “Hopenhagen” conference so many had wished for. It didn’t agree on much more than continuing the discussions until Mexico this December. The meeting took note, and no more than that, of the “accord” in which almost all the 115 countries present recognised the need to limit temperature rises to 2°c.

In that sense, Copenhagen was a failure, yet it also clarified three challenges to be met by the end of this year. The first is, and most promising, is to fulfil the promises on financing. The second is to try in Mexico to develop the accord into a binding global UN-agreement. The third is to continue the negotiations until Mexico on all the more specific areas – above all reduction targets, commitments and actions – without creating any doubts about the EU’s own willingness to continue along the Kyoto track.

Advertisement

It is very much to be hoped that the EU will take the lead in all three of these processes. That would mean that making new money available to developing countries has to begin right now; the short-term finance offer from the EU of €2.4bn a year from now until 2012 will have to be delivered extremely quickly. One of the most effective ways would be through forest conservation schemes like the Amazonas fund. If the EU is to be trusted in the developing world, it has to commit additional spending to that already earmarked for the 2015 millennium development goals (MDGs), not least because we already know that the mid-term goal of 0.56 % of GNP by 2010 has not yet been reached. It will be a major challenge for EU countries as a whole to reach the MDG target of 0.7% of their GNP by 2015 while at the same time giving additional climate change funding. But that is what we in the EU have promised, and the short-term delivery of climate change help must begin before the summer of this year. At the same time, the EU has to reach a decision on long-term financing, following the European Commission’s estimate that the world’s developing countries will need €100bn a year by 2020. It’s going to be up to the EU to give clear guarantees that it will contribute its fair share.

If the Copenhagen accord is to be transformed into a binding UN decision, the EU will have to work hard to dispel all the mistrust among developing countries about its own willingness to sign up to steep reductions like reducing CO2 emissions by 30% by 2020 rather than by 20 %. This level of EU commitment is going to be needed before the mid-year meeting in Bonn, if the EU wants to take the lead on the global scene. Copenhagen’s legacy at present is a lot of mistrust.

This is what is needed if the EU is to be in a position to play a leading role in the years ahead. But these initiatives are no more than a pre-condition for the even more concentrated, clever and effective EU climate change initiatives that will be needed in relation to developing countries. The key word here is going to be equality, in line with both the spirit and the wording of the 2007 Lisbon strategic partnership between Africa and the EU. It is also going to be important to recognise that developing countries are often in very different situations, so the concrete policies to be thrashed out need to take into account the differences that exist between the LDCs and BRIC countries like China, India and Brazil. But of course what unites these different groups is that real partnerships with the EU are in all these cases the way forward.

Helping developing countries adapt to a low carbon economy is closely linked to the same agenda as better development aid. This means partnerships for creating national plans that have clear climate goals, greater coordination between aid donors, more transparency and the involvement of civil society, businesses and national parliaments. On top of all this, the climate agenda demands much more regional cooperation on development aid than we have seen in the past. The climate agenda offers us a chance to breathe new life into the relationship between donor and developing countries.

This whole process of adaptation is crucial for developing countries, and it is up to the EU member states to emphasise the consequences of climate change. This includes detailed physical information about climate change and about the vulnerability both of nature and of human kind. It includes imparting knowledge about infrastructures like water systems, crops and health. Many of the problems that these countries are already dealing with will worsen, with new problems being added to them. Adaptation therefore has to be integrated into all existing development plans and initiatives. This is where the EU can really make a difference by making climate change an integral part of its development aid and its donor coordination efforts.

The second major challenge to be met is finding ways the EU can create low carbon development projects, especially those that focus on energy. We know that more than a billion and a half people are still without power, and therefore have no real prospect of development. The EU already has a very good platform on linking energy to its development aid thanks to the Lisbon partnership with Africa. This now needs to be further developed instead of inventing any new instruments. Renewable energy must also be strengthened, with a strong focus on solar and wind. The European Development Bank needs to make more long-term financing available to the energy facility, as well as to infrastructure. Traditional thinking has limited infrastructure projects on energy to hydro-projects and coal or oil based plants, but wind farms and solar plants should not only be for rich countries. There are considerable technology transfer and long-term employment gains to be made in solar and wind. Cooperation between the EU and the African Union can, if designed the right way, be the most effective way to stimulate technology transfers. In Mali I have seen for myself the way a solar driven water pump has transformed the lives of the women and how solar power has extended school hours into the evenings and given villages a refrigerator to store medicine for the sick.

The new climate-related development agenda must aim at renewable energy both in de-centralised rural environments and in integrated regional and centralised versions. What we in Europe need to do is to use our own experience of renewables and of energy efficiency to shape a new partnership with developing countries. That means scientific and educational cooperation, the creation of networks between, for example, electricity companies and the broad involvement of private sector companies to enable them to develop new business opportunities, especially in energy efficiency and renewables.

Climate change has been called the biggest challenge that will face the next generation and for Europe it is a chance to play a major role on the global scene in this fast-changing world. We Europeans will not get too many such chances in the coming years, and my earnest hope is that we will understand all its possibilities and dare to take the lead.


You need to be logged in to rate and comment on articles.
Click the log in or register button in the top right corner of this page.
Average rating:
Add rating
4 COMMENT(S)
  • Re:The climate challenge now offers the EU a global role

Did the EU mishandle its negotiations in the COP15 Copenhagen Summit?

What do you think?

By Europe's World - Vox Pop on 2/22/2010 11:45
Report inappropriate content
  • Re:The climate challenge now offers the EU a global role

Almost none of the EU’s main goals were achieved in Copenhagen; this has left observers speculating as to whether Europe was voiceless, toothless or merely hapless. It seemed to believe the final negotiations would follow its own model of exhaustive debate followed by hard bargaining yielding a common outcome. Instead, there was a disjointed process yielding a fait accompli still under discussion while President Obama was winging his way home. At the end Europe was left holding its 30% card with no table on which to play it, but certain aspects that were agreed, like a two degree limit and financing commitments, could be in part attributed to Europe’s leadership on these issues over the longer term. The lesson is that where the EU has proactively framed expectations, it sets the pace. Moving forward it will have to do the same, as Mr. Gade suggests: successful implementation of the financing package using money additional to current pledges; committing to 30% (or greater) emissions reductions by 2020 while creating new economic opportunities; and taking the reins of a UN process that many initially assumed to be terminally battered, but has seen consistent support from Parties around the world. Fortunately the European Commission and Council, in their recent statements on post-Copenhagen action, seem to have taken on board many of these ideas. The challenge for Europe will be to find internal consensus so it can project its influence more effectively than it did last year.

James P. Leape is the Director General of WWF International.

By James P. Leape on 3/17/2010 14:35
Report inappropriate content
  • Re:The climate challenge now offers the EU a global role

I fully share Steen's assessment on how the EU should go on with international climate policies. Nevertheless, I would like to add a comment on the way the negotiations should proceed in the coming years.Event though we all hope that there will be a comprehensive and legally binding agreement in Mexico by the end of the year, we have to work on a ´Plan B´ in case, the negotiations will end at a similar status as they did in Copenhagen.So, how could this alternative version to a legally binding UNFCCC agreement look like? I would argue for a two-track strategy. On the one side, we need to engage with those countries that show willingness to join us in our effort to reduce greenhouse gases and preserve our planet. No matter which size they are or which economic impact they have, it is important to go ahead with a few states that share our risk assessment. On the other side, we need to look out for alternatives to solving everything at the same time. Instead, we should on what we can achieve realistically and start with some sectors, where either only a limited number of states are involved or where it seems to be less complicated to agree on a common position internationally. Examples could be the protection of tropical rain forests, limits to emissions from maritime transport and aviation. Despite these ideas of working on a Plan B, our emphasis should lie on getting a deal sealed in Mexico. But we should also be prepared for the case that we won't get it.

Jo Leinen, MEP and Chairman of the EP Delegation to COP15

By Jo Leinen on 3/17/2010 14:50
Report inappropriate content
  • Re:The climate challenge now offers the EU a global role

EU proclaimed with pride, prior to NOP15, that it would take the lead, but no one followed. But here is another proposal that EU should take the lead: “It is very much to be hoped that the EU will take the lead in these processes” writs Gade. Says who, I wonder? Is there any reason to believe the world will listen and follow this time (except smaller poor countries hoping for additional cash aid to support their corrupt regimes)?

Gade ends with “Climate change has been called the biggest challenge ……and for Europe it is a chance to play a major role on the global scene”. Oh, I think this is what many fear, EU sees this as a chance to pretend its big, powerful and important. Then the climate change issue will be high-jacked for pure power-political reasons and the possibilities to debate and find solutions will be numbed.
Realistically, not much will hapen in Mexico or SA since all proposals are too expensive and footed on less than convincing science. As readers might be aware, UN/IPCC has just decided to investigate itself, despite assurances that the science is sound. Why spend millons and loose time if there wasn't a problem?

By Arne ERIKSSON on 3/19/2010 16:30
Report inappropriate content

 
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
le plus populaire du journal

le plus populaire de communité

le plus populaire des partenaires

Logon