http://ocean2012.eu/resources/view/id/15116?download=true
The
report, Environmental
and Social Criteria for Allocating Access to Fisheries Resources, offers case
studies from ten
different fisheries in Europe and around the world to show how
reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) could be modeled.
Specifically,
the report recommends:
Selectivity – Different
fishing methods result in different amounts of by-catch. Fishers using fishing
methods with low by-catch should be given priority access to the available
resources;
Environmental impact – The impact
of different gears and practices on the environment, including damage to the
seabed and pollution, vary widely. Fishers using less destructive fishing
methods should be given priority access;
Energy consumption – Some gear
and vessel types, like some trawlers and seiners, require enormous amounts of
energy compared to the fish they catch. Fishers using vessels and fishing
methods that consume less energy per tonne of fish caught should be given
priority access;
Employment and working conditions
– Fishing methods that provide more employment opportunities and have less
environmental damage should be given priority access. Working conditions should
comply with relevant international standards, notably the 2007 International
Labour Organisation (ILO) Work in Fishing Convention; and
History of compliance – Past
compliance with the rules of the CFP by fishers as well as EU Member States
should be considered when allocating access to fishing rights.
“The right to fish in EU waters should
be granted to those who contribute to the goal of ending overfishing,” said
Markus Knigge of the Pew Environment Group and OCEAN2012. “Allocating access to
commonly held fisheries resources through the implementation of strict
environmental and social criteria is an effective way of doing this.”
On April 22, 2009, the European
Commission launched a reform of the CFP. As part of a broader, stepwise
approach to returning EU fisheries to a sustainable footing, OCEAN2012
suggested replacing, or at least enhancing, relative stability with a system of
allocating access to fisheries based on an explicit consideration of certain
criteria. The allocation system should contribute to environmental
sustainability, a more equitable distribution of access to available fishing
resources and a culture of compliance.
“The fish that inhabit
the EU’s waters are a commons resource. EU Member State governments are their
custodians. They have a responsibility to the public and to fishing communities
to restore the health of these stocks and keep the communities viable. The
ten examined fisheries in this report clearly demonstrate the feasibility of
basing access to fisheries resources on environmental and social criteria,”
Knigge said.
The
fisheries studied in the report are the Georges Bank cod fishery in Cape Cod
USA; the toothfish fishery in South Georgia; trawling in Koster-Väderö
fjord, Sweden; the Prud’homies fishery Languedoc-Roussillon,
France; the Os Miñarzos fishery in Lira-Carnota Spain; Creel
Fishing in Loch Torridon Scotland; the South-West Mackerel Box fishery in
England; The Integrated Fisheries Foundation (IFF) in the Wadden Sea,
Netherlands; traditional island lobster fishing in the Torres Strait, Papua New
Guinea and Australia; and the hake handline, traditional linefish, west coast
rock lobster and abalone fisheries in the Western Cape, South Africa.