You are not logged in.
Please log in or register to submit
comments or rate articles.
 
 
Catalonia_2009

ESDP and NATO

11/17/2009
Author : Florian Pantazi
Since the adoption of ESDP, the EU's defence forces have become increasingly active in troublespots, from the Middle East to Asia or Africa. The rise of the European Union as a military and strategic power, mirrored by developments in Asia, could mean that in a decade from now NATO will be obsolete.
 

ESDP (the European Security and Defence Policy), agreed upon at St. Malo ten years ago, and the EU’s own defence force demonstrate the fact that the European Union has become a military and strategic player of growing importance in world affairs. Although the EU defence establishment is being regularly criticised by its American counterpart for refusing to invest more in replacing obsolete military hardware, this situation is likely to change significantly in the next decade.

As current developments indicate, it is entirely possible that Asian nations too will endeavour to create in the not-too-distant future a military and strategic alliance of their own, to complement their economic integration plans.For the last ten years, China has proceeded with the modernisation of its armed forces and is in the process of building a blue water navy. South Korea and Taiwan, on the other hand, have sizeable, very well-equipped armies. The military integration of Asian nations is less improbable than we might now think. When this happens, NATO as the world’s foremost military alliance will effectively have to be replaced with structures capable of accommodating two other up-and-coming military alliances : Europe’s and Asia’s.

Viewed in this light, France’s latest moves to reintegrate into NATO’s military structures could prove, if not downright detrimental to ESDP, rather lacking in strategic vision. EU strategic planners, after all, should spend most of the time thinking of how to improve the new European force’s military capabilities and the co-ordination between its various national components, and not on reforming NATO. 

To complement these efforts, European political leaders would do well to concentrate on framing a well-defined common EU foreign policy rather than on selecting this or that person for the top job. When this will happen, Asian policymakers and analysts will take Europe more seriously than it is the case right now.

 
Keyword search
 
Report inappropriate content

You need to be logged in to rate and comment on articles.
Click the log in or register button in the top right corner of this page.
Average rating:
Add rating
 

The thirteenth edition of Europe's World is out. We feel it's fair to say that few if any publications in the field of international relations and policy debate have grown as fast or widened their scope so remarkably as Europe's World.

Europe's World is also adding two new sections entitled the Arab World and China to complement existing sections that as well as covering international and European issues include Security & defence, the Developing World and Sustainable Europe.

 

 

 
WHAT ARE TURKEY'S
SECURITY AIMS?




Turkey faces a diverse set of security threats and challenges – growing Kurdish nationalism and separatism, increasing sectarian violence in Iraq, an assertive Iran with nuclear ambitions, and a weak, fragmented Lebanon dominated by radical groups with close ties to Syria and Iran. What are Turkey's security aims?

 


What do YOU think?