Think tank europe

What Does NATO’s Libya Mission Mean for EU Defence?

19/01/2012
Author : Madariaga College of Europe Foundation
Madariaga Report - 15 December 2011
 

The operational and command support offered by NATO for the implementation of Resolution 1973 points to the Alliance’s successful transition to its new Strategic Concept, agreed in Lisbon in 2010 with the aim of boosting NATO’s ability to conduct crisis management tasks beyond members’ shores. In contrast, the EU’s divisions over the implementation of a “no-fly zone” to protect civilians from Qaddafi points to the Union’s weakness in meeting its own commitment to crisis response, as reaffirmed under the Lisbon treaty in 2009. Ultimately, it was left to Franco-British leadership to steer military efforts and not the Union. But where does this leave the EU and its nascent defence policy? Has the EU scuppered its chances of being a military actor for good, or does the Union’s inaction make the case for European defence more compelling?

A Citizen's Controversy with

Lt. Gen. (Ret.) Jean-Paul Perruche
Director of Studies at the l’Institut de Recherche Stratégique de l'Ecole Militaire (IRSEM) in Paris and former Director General of the European Union Military Staff.

Vice-Admiral Squadron Leader Xavier Païtard
French Permanent Military Representative to the European Union and NATO.

Moderated by:
Daniel Fiott
Research Fellow, Madariaga – College of Europe Foundation

Download

 
Keyword search
 
Report inappropriate content

You need to be logged in to rate and comment on articles.
Click the log in or register button in the top right corner of this page.
Add rating
 
Thursday, 24 May 2012
le plus populaire du journal

le plus populaire de communité

le plus populaire des partenaires

Logon